henry schaffer wrote:
>Steve writes:
>> ... In fact,
>> I've resisted requests to include material about netiquette;
>> I've always believed that sort of thing is better covered in
>> a periodical "Welcome to..." posting.)
>
> I do include that type of material in the alt.locksmithing FAQ. But
> perhaps there is a difference in readership experience which makes
> different practices reasonable. I would guess that the readers of a C
> FAQ would have more prior knowledge of netiquette that do our readers...
Actually, no; comp.lang.c has no particular monopoly on Usenet
cluefulness these days, either.
> At any rate, our readers often do need guidance in netiquette.
No question. My point was just that a periodical "Welcome to"
posting is arguably a better place to provide that guidance than
a periodical FAQ list posting. (Or not.)
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved