> Since you are not really happy with the answer that you have at the
> moment, why not include a statement that this question is
> controversial, and include all the explanations that you can find,
> including the parts of the persons answer that you "can" agree with.
His position is that it shouldn't be equivocating. His viewpoint is
already represented ("Ki exists absolutely.... [it] can increase your
strength, throw people around, etc."). My problems with the current
answer is that it assumes that everybody means the same thing when they
talk about it (which is also his position). Yes, there already is a
disclaimer that the question and answer are controversial.
*shrug* At this point, I'm just going to ignore him on this topic. I
know that when I get around to changing that answer, he'll post a lot
again, but I think I'll continue to ignore him unless he cuts down on
his troll-like behaviors.
It is nice to be around other FAQ maintainers, though... my only
interaction with one was with my predecessor, who was inactive in the
extreme on the newsgroup.
-- Matthew Weigel Research Systems Programmer mcweigel+@cs.cmu.edu************************************************************* To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here *************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved