Edward Reid wrote:
> At 11:08 AM -0500 12/05/00, SiKing wrote:
>> Also, I do know that it is supposed to be mispelled as "Supercedes:"
>> ...
>> I remember reading someplace that the person who wrote the spec on this
>> screwed up, but now it is in the spec ...
>
> I don't know what you heard, but you heard wrong. It's spelled
> "Supersedes" in the dictionary, in RFC1036 (which is the spec), and in
> every successful superseding message posted to Usenet.
For what it's worth, though, there *is* a document out there
somewhere that makes a claim along the lines SiKing mentions.
I don't remember where it is, but I've seen it, too. It was
pretty authoritative-looking, I think, so I'd say a reader
is excused for being misled by it.
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved