Re: Future of FAQ Archives..

---------

Danny R. Faught (faught@rsn.hp.com)
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:00:05 -0600


On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 01:53:17PM -0500, charles.macdonald@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca wrote:
> There is quite a bit to think about. There are some who feel that Usenet
> itself is on the way out, so the first re-definition may be the nature of
> what is an FAQ? At the moment to be approved an information posting must
> be on topic for at least one Usenet Group. If Usenet fades away, what will
> be the criteria for inclusion in (whatever) FAQ archive?

If Usenet fades away, much of the motivation to maintain my FAQ goes
away. I need some definition of the community I'm serving - and just
hanging out a web page on the search engines doesn't give me this.

> The trick is that
> someone looking for the information may have difficulty finding it even
> with a web search tool. 2006010 documents match the query "FAQ" in the alta
> vista Canadian < http://www.altavista.ca/ > index, I did not try the world
> index.

Yes, the search engines need to do a much better job of indexing Usenet
FAQ. Without Usenet, perhaps the search engines would have to follow their
own process of judging which are worthwhile. Not that rtfm judges based on
content, but I think the approval process itself weeds out a lot of people
who aren't willing to follow through (for good reason). A similar process
doesn't seem to exist on the search engines.

-Danny



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@faqs.org

© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved