FAQ Maintainers Mailing List: Re: disclaimer reactions

------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BEC133.72965420
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To: "FAQ-Maintainers" <faq-maintainers@lists.consensus.com>
Subject: Re: disclaimer reactions
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:38:58 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I didn't recognize in there that I suggested the
aux disclaimer as being more visible, and also
suggested and implemented the use of both the
X-disclaimer and disclaimer to make the most
of it.

----------
> From: David Alex Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca>
> To: faq-maintainers@consensus.com
> Subject: disclaimer reactions
> Date: Friday, June 25, 1999 1:24 PM
>=20
> So far I have 4 people agreeing to add a disclaimer line. Thanks!
>=20
> My theory on aux header (disclaimer) versus x-disclaimer in the news
header is
> that the former is more visible, and it's up to the maintainer how
visible you
> want it to be (as long as it's there). I personally used =
x-disclaimer,
> whereas the person whose FAQ that prompted me to make this request =
used
> disclaimer -- and added a bunch of stuff after my suggested "approval =
for
> *.answers is based on form, not content" since he had other things he
wanted
> to disclaim, too. That's OK, as long as something closely resembling =
my
> suggested phrase is reasonably easy to find in there.
>=20

------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BEC133.72965420
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To: "FAQ-Maintainers" <faq-maintainers@lists= .consensus.com>
Subject:=20 Re: disclaimer reactions
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:38:58=20 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: = Microsoft=20 Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: = text/plain;=20 charset=3DISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I didn't recognize in there that I = suggested=20 the
aux disclaimer as being more visible, and also
suggested = and=20 implemented the use of both the
X-disclaimer and disclaimer to make = the=20 most
of it.

----------
> From: David Alex = Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca>
>= To: faq-maintainers@consensus.c= om
>=20 Subject: disclaimer reactions
> Date: Friday, June 25, 1999 1:24=20 PM
>
> So far I have 4 people agreeing to add a disclaimer=20 line. Thanks!
>
> My theory on aux header = (disclaimer) versus=20 x-disclaimer in the news
header is
> that the former is more = visible,=20 and it's up to the maintainer how
visible you
> want it to be = (as long=20 as it's there). I personally used x-disclaimer,
> whereas = the person=20 whose FAQ that prompted me to make this request used
> disclaimer = -- and=20 added a bunch of stuff after my suggested "approval for
> = *.answers is=20 based on form, not content" since he had other things = he
wanted
> to=20 disclaim, too. That's OK, as long as something closely resembling=20 my
> suggested phrase is reasonably easy to find in there.
> =