re: Q: call it authorized faqs or what?

---------

datalog@iinet.net.au (charles.macdonald@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca)
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 8:02:10 -0500


Perhaps "Usenet FAQ manintainer" or "compiler"

Usenet being both an venerable network, and not part of the commercial web.
With all the disscusion of the term "official" in the past, I might shy away
from mentioning it.

Charles MacDonald - Labour Information Management
< My own Opinion unless Otherwise Credited >
---------- Original Text ----------

From: <datalog@iinet.net.au>, on 22-Dec-1999 04:16:
To: INET[<FAQ-Maintainers@lists.consensus.com>]

I manage four faqs now, and proudly wish to display this on my other
projects, but the term 'faqs' is not specific enough - and
"faqs as authorized by the *answers team"
seems much to wordy.

Every commercial site has an faq it seems...

I am not trying to strike the fear or god into my readers, but something
to distinguish my faqs from others would be nice. Suggestions?

David Novak
david@cn.net.au
information research faq / patent research faq
trademark research faq / web research faq



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@faqs.org

© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved