![]()
It was last posted on or around 1999/12/16.
It will be posted again on or around 2000/02/15.
and, at my site, the following has appeared (trn output):
news.answers (moderated) #146556 (0 + 1018 more) [1]
Supersedes: <esperanto/spamo_940075077@rtfm.mit.edu>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.esperanto,soc.answers,news.answers
From: Yves Bellefeuille <yan@storm.ca>
[1] FAQ-eto pri spamo
Followup-To: soc.culture.esperanto
Summary: Basic information about spam. In Esperanto.
+ Bazaj informoj pri spamo. En Esperanto.
Organization: None
X-Last-Updated: 1999-09-17
Originator: faqserv@penguin-lust.MIT.EDU
Date: Thu Dec 16 15:30:06 EST 1999
Lines: 167
X-Trace: dreaderd 945376206 22888 18.181.0.29
Archive-name: esperanto/spamo
Posting-Frequency: Every two months (afishita chiujn du monatojn)
URL: http://www.esperanto.net/veb/spam-faq.html
The megaposting on Dec 15 claims to have posted Nat's FAQs:
Article <nude-faq/part1_945115279@rtfm.mit.edu> posted successfully.
Article <nude-faq/part5_945115279@rtfm.mit.edu> posted successfully.
Article <nude-faq/part2_945115279@rtfm.mit.edu> posted successfully.
Article <nude-faq/part4_945115279@rtfm.mit.edu> posted successfully.
Article <nude-faq/part3_945115279@rtfm.mit.edu> posted successfully.
and from the server's status information:
The status of the nude-faq/part1 posting is as follows:
It was last posted on or around 1999/12/13.
It will be posted again on or around 2000/01/12.
However the most recent posting to reach my site is from Nov 11, so there
would appear to still be a problem of some sort. I'm not sure how post_faq.pl
could believe things were posted successfully if they weren't, unless inews
was somehow lying about what it was doing.
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
![]()
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved