Re: Check This Out. #3B24

Edward Reid (edward@paleo.org)
Thu, 29 Apr 99 08:21:54 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Kent Landfield: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"
Previous message: era eriksson: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"
Next in thread: Kent Landfield: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"
Reply: Kent Landfield: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"

Era writes:
> The one I got had definitely passed through Consensus' server, and had
> all the customary List-* headers etc. (Shouldn't these be X-List-*
> anyway?)

No. See RFC 2369, "The Use of URLs as Meta-Syntax for Core
Mail List Commands and their Transport through Message
Header Fields". Sources include

ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2369.txt
http://www.it.kth.se/docs/rfc/rfcs/rfc2369.txt

We covered this a few months ago too, so anyone who wasn't
part of that discussion should read the archives before
starting it up again. Please.

(Thanks to Mike Oliver for identifying the ISI URL for me,
which is the authoritative repository. He gently pointed
out that the ISI archive and a number of mirrors are
identified in the comp.protocols.tcp-ip FAQ.)

Edward Reid

Next message: Kent Landfield: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"
Previous message: era eriksson: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"
Next in thread: Kent Landfield: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"
Reply: Kent Landfield: "Re: Check This Out. #3B24"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]