Re: Faq maintainers and commercialism

---------

Paolo G. Cordone (pamolo@indigo.ie)
Sun, 4 Apr 1999 18:31:16 +0100


At 23:59 -0500 3/4/1999, Pat Berry wrote:

>I agree that this is, at the very least, a gray area. But what if the
>items for sale are hard to find, and providing a way to order them is a
>service to readers of the FAQ? If the maintainer gets paid for the
>service, of course, that could be a conflict of interest.

Yes, I think this is a tricky area. I am maintaining the FAQ for
classical online CD stores which I started when I realised that in
rec.music.classical.recordings the question about which one is the
best store was being posted virtually every day.

My FAQ lists a lot of (commercial) stores, however, I do not profit
from any of their sales. Mind you, I also got some unsolicited mail
about affiliated programs. But I only want to provide a service to
the readers of rmcr, not make money out of it. And the fact that my
FAQ is mainly a link to commercial site does not make me feel guilty.
After all, it is the purpose of my document.

Paolo

---
Paolo G. Cordone
pamolo@indigo.ie
http://indigo.ie/~pamolo/

"Windows 95: n. 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to a 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition."



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@faqs.org

© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved