I don't see why. If you kept a log of /who/ accessed the FAQ, then
yes, there'd be a concern. Simply counting how many people access a
FAQ shouldn't be a problem.
> > Generate a summary each month for each FAQ and mail it to the authors?
>
> Perhaps you could do this, but only for those FAQs whose authors had
> specifically requested it. That should reduce your workload and avoid
> the problem of not having good mail addresses for the authors...
The way I look at it, anything which would require responding to
requests by authors (yes/no, add/remove) would *add* to their
workload. All/none would be better, IMO.
Balanone
maintainer: Balanone's Temple of Set FAQ
URL: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/4979/baltsfaq.html
submitted, approval to news.answers pending