Re: Obsolete versions of FAQs archived

---------

Charles R. MacDonald (cmacd@achilles.net)
Sat, 10 Feb 1996 15:22:57 -0500 (EST)


On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, Matt Messina wrote:

> On faq-maintainers@consensus.com wrean@krl.caltech.edu wrote:
> >I maintain two FAQs for the newsgroup alt.support.asthma, and since
> >these are medical FAQs, tend to be a little on the compulsive side
> >about having only the latest version available.
> How about putting a notice such as
>
> Information contained in this FAQ is potentially dangerous if it is
> obselete. If it is later than <postingDate + timeToBecomeObselete>,
> please obtain the newest version from <URL> to assure that you get the
> latest facts.
>
> This FAQ is not intended as substitute for the advice of a medical
> professional.
>
> near the top?
> --
I would like to second that sugestion..You might not only have web
sites. After all, There are at least two organizations that sell a
complete set of FAQ files on CD ROM in the USA, and I beleve at least one
in Europe.

Any FAQ that is posted is likely to be around for a very long time. If
the information id likely to be changing, (medical , legal, income
tax...) A disclamer or careful wording in those sections where teh
content is likely to change over time would not be out of line.

Charles, Husband of an FAQ maintainer...

Charles MacDonald Stittsville Ontario cmacd@achilles.net
<a href="http://www.achilles.net/~cmacd/">homepage</a>
A Ship in Port is SAFE, but that is not what a Ship is built for.



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved