Re: HD Recording FAQ

---------

Chris Lewis (clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca)
Tue, 3 Dec 1996 01:25:40 -0500


On Dec 2, 10:37, Danny R. Faught wrote:
} Subject: Re: HD Recording FAQ
} Rich Kulawiec wrote:
} > To subvert this system by disguising a commercial advertisement (which
} > doesn't answer *anything*) as a FAQ is reprehensible and destructive.

} I've certainly seen a wide variety of documents called FAQs, including
} documents of a commercial nature on a vendor's web site. I don't know
} if I've seen them on Usenet before, though.

There's a series of them, including one called the "digital scope
faq". They're under autocancel because the article count is over
the spam threshold.

-- 
For more information on spam, including countermeasures and resources,
see the Internet Spam Boycott, at <URL:http://www.vix.com/spam/>.

Chris Lewis: _Una confibula non sat est_



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved