Re: URL: headers, again

---------

Lennart Regebro (lennart@bump.traffic.is)
Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:27:00 GMT


On 9 Oct 95 at 13:17, Steve Summit wrote:

> Just the other day I realized, therefore, that the right thing to
> use might be a single, generic header after all, and if there are
> 73 things you'd like to point at, to put pointers to all of them
> (suitably annotated, of course) in the one page that the generic
> header points at.
>
> [Obviously, this works for links that *people* would want to
> chase, but not nearly as well for links that automatic tools
> want to pick up.]

Well, you could have a header like this:

Link: The latest version of the FAQ: <http://www.traffic.is/faqs/gffaq.html>
Link: Maintaner homepage: <http://www.traffic.is/~lennart>

Or the other way around, with the links first and description later.
This should be easy to pick up by automatic tools, and since you can
have several headers with a description you can link to whatever you
want.

Bingo!

-- 
Lennart Regebro:                        lennart@bump.traffic.is
Moderator of comp.os.netware.announce:  cona-request@stacken.kth.se
Object-Fax technical support:           techsupp@traffic.is
Home page:                              http://www.traffic.is/~lennart/


[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved