![]()
| We've been round and round on this one, and I don't remember a
| consensus emerging. My feeling is that so many good ideas
| emerged that it was clearly too complicated an issue to encode
| completely yet simply and naturally in headers.
|
| Just the other day I realized, therefore, that the right thing to
| use might be a single, generic header after all, and if there are
| 73 things you'd like to point at, to put pointers to all of them
| (suitably annotated, of course) in the one page that the generic
| header points at.
|
| [Obviously, this works for links that *people* would want to
| chase, but not nearly as well for links that automatic tools
| want to pick up.]
I agree. Keeping things simple is very important.
Any change should be an extention of the current scheme.
At this moment, some 10% of the faqs have an Url:-line,
so acceptance of these features is low.
I support the suggestion of Lennart Regebro that Url:-lines
could look like
Url: some-url augmenting-text
| Steve Summit
Henk Penning
-- Henk P. Penning, Dept of Computer Science, Utrecht University \__/ \__/ \ Padualaan 14, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands. \__/ \__/ Telephone: +31-30-2534106, fax: 2513791, NIC-handle: HPP1 _/ \__/ \__/ \ Maintainer of ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/NEWS.ANSWERS/ \__/ \__/ \__/ \__/
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
![]()
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved