Re: URL: headers, again

---------

Henk Penning (henkp@cs.ruu.nl)
Tue, 10 Oct 1995 13:39:06 +0100 (MET)


Steve Summit writes:

| We've been round and round on this one, and I don't remember a
| consensus emerging. My feeling is that so many good ideas
| emerged that it was clearly too complicated an issue to encode
| completely yet simply and naturally in headers.
|
| Just the other day I realized, therefore, that the right thing to
| use might be a single, generic header after all, and if there are
| 73 things you'd like to point at, to put pointers to all of them
| (suitably annotated, of course) in the one page that the generic
| header points at.
|
| [Obviously, this works for links that *people* would want to
| chase, but not nearly as well for links that automatic tools
| want to pick up.]

I agree. Keeping things simple is very important.

Any change should be an extention of the current scheme.
At this moment, some 10% of the faqs have an Url:-line,
so acceptance of these features is low.

I support the suggestion of Lennart Regebro that Url:-lines
could look like

Url: some-url augmenting-text

| Steve Summit

Henk Penning

-- 
Henk P. Penning, Dept of Computer Science, Utrecht University \__/  \__/  \
Padualaan 14, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands. \__/  \__/
Telephone: +31-30-2534106, fax: 2513791, NIC-handle: HPP1 _/  \__/  \__/  \
Maintainer of ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/NEWS.ANSWERS/  \__/  \__/  \__/  \__/


[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved