Approval time for new FAQ?

pshuang@MIT.EDU
Thu, 23 Feb 1995 03:07:11 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Sibit: "To split or not to split"
Previous message: pshuang@MIT.EDU: "Updating the FAQ archives prior to posting"
In reply to: Henry van Cleef: "Re: Approval time for new FAQ?"

> I can't understand this. If you are processing mail from Feb. 18,
> that is well after I mailed my faq to you (Feb. 11 this time). I
> don't know what happened to my mailing Jan. 13.

As it happens, I dealt with your submissions a few hours ago. But
yes, there is a typo in the sample auto-reply message I sent out. It
should have read "01/18/1995" instead of "02/18/1995".

Also, to clarify, the auto-replier has not been turned out yet, so
don't be concerned if you don't see an auto-reply and you've sent
something in very recently to us.

Ping Huang, member of the *.answers moderation team
(news-answers-request@MIT.EDU)

Next message: Sibit: "To split or not to split"
Previous message: pshuang@MIT.EDU: "Updating the FAQ archives prior to posting"
In reply to: Henry van Cleef: "Re: Approval time for new FAQ?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]