Re: Approval time for new FAQ?
Henry van Cleef (vancleef@bga.com)
Wed, 22 Feb 1995 20:56:41 -0600 (CST)
As pshuang@MIT.EDU said
>
>
> As of 02/22/1995, our incoming mail queue is 302 messages deep.
> We are currently processing messages that have arrived on or before
> 02/18/1995. (The afore-mentioned date may be non-representative of the
> amount of time you can expect to wait to hear back from us, however.)
>
> The work load of managing the duties of moderating the *.answers has
> been steadily increasing, to somewhat overwhelming proportions. What
> this means it may take as much as 3-4 weeks to process your request.
> Relatively simple *.answers-related queries and requests to be added
> (or deleted) from the faq-maintainers and faq-maintainers-announce
> mailing lists will probably be processed much faster than that, though.
>
I can't understand this. If you are processing mail from Feb. 18, that
is well after I mailed my faq to you (Feb. 11 this time). I don't know
what happened to my mailing Jan. 13.
I'm reposting biweekly, and most of the group has given up hope that
the faq will be archived unless we find a place to archive it
ourselves. Our major problem in keeping a current fact posted is the
number of sites not honoring Expires: headers and on short expire
times.
--
***********************************************************
Hank van Cleef vancleef@bga.com vancleef@tmn.com
***********************************************************
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
faq-admin@landfield.com
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved