On the other hand, the original comment about the magizine being 'sleazy'
sounds rather subjective as well. Perhaps it would be better for folk
to just let folk draw their own conclusion by stating things like
"As an example of content, Volume 7 Issue 5 covered 60 ways to use a dead
fat person, product reviews of IsoSlim written by employees of the
product, and an article by Dr Ima S Cum regarding the use of crystals
in losing 100 pounds a week without changing one's diet or increasing
activity levels"
This would be documented fact, confirmable by looking at a table of
contents. As long as it was representative of the material in the
magazine, then if there were objections, additional statements by
the publisher could be added before or after such a statement.
--Larry W. Virden INET: lvirden@cas.org Personal: 674 Falls Place, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068-1614 Anything said in this email is my opinion, and not necessarily my employer's.
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved