Re: Why? (was: A request for permission to use copyrighted FAQ's)

---------

Russell Nelson (nelson@crynwr.com)
Fri, 18 Mar 94 22:59 EST


From: Mark Eckenwiler <eck@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 1994 16:09:56 -0500 (EST)
Cc: faq-maintainers@MIT.EDU

+ Furthermore, I think it would be so cut and dry that an attorney
+ would love to take this on pro bonum.

If the FAQ author/compiler has the sense to include a copyright
notice, there's no reason that resources (read "attorneys' fees")
would be an issue, even for a poor, sole maintainer. The reason for
including the notice is that it entitles a copyright owner to recover
a) guaranteed statutory damages (instead of actual damages, which
might be nil), and b) *attorneys' fees*.

That is not sufficient. You must also register the copyright. Costs
$20 and you need to fill out a form. I have Form TX in PostScript.
It's been posted to comp.sources.postscript and so is in their archives.

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com> ftp.msen.com:pub/vendor/crynwr/crynwr.wav
Crynwr Software | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | ask4 PGP key
11 Grant St. | +1 315 268 1925 (9201 FAX) | Quakers do it in the light
Potsdam, NY 13676 | LPF member - ask me about the harm software patents do.



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved