Re: The letter is way off base...

Mike Meyer (mwm@contessa.phone.net)
Wed, 14 Dec 94 20:54:01 PST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Peter J. Kappesser: "Re: cron or perl automation of posting FAQs"
Previous message: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: (copyright) Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
In reply to: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: The letter is way off base..."
Next in thread: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: The letter is way off base..."
Reply: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: The letter is way off base..."

> >allows any copying that is "standard usenet and internet usage", no
> >matter what the license says. What walnut creek is doing qualifies as
> >standard usenet & internet usage. You've waived your right to control
> >this type of thing by the very act of posting your FAQs.
>
> I've waived no rights whatsoever

I'm curious - do you really believe that if you posted something to a
mainstream group with a copyright notice and license stating that
copying to or by any node in a ".com" domain was expressely forbidden
that you could win a lawsuit against netcom when the article turned up
on one of their servers?

<mike

Next message: Peter J. Kappesser: "Re: cron or perl automation of posting FAQs"
Previous message: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: (copyright) Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
In reply to: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: The letter is way off base..."
Next in thread: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: The letter is way off base..."
Reply: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: The letter is way off base..."

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]