Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?

Eric S. Raymond (esr@locke.ccil.org)
Sun, 11 Dec 1994 15:32:51 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Previous message: Kent Landfield: "Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
In reply to: Kent Landfield: "Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
Next in thread: Tim Pierce: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"
Reply: Tim Pierce: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"

> If people see the need for a new auxiliary header then vote on one and
> its semantics and take www talk to www-talk. FAQs will exist for years
> to come and 'pie in the sky' discussions add little to improving them.

No flame intended, but what `www-talk' are you referring to?

I think the ISP pricing discussion is winding down anyhow.

-- 
					Eric S. Raymond <esr@locke.ccil.org>
					WWW: //www.thyrsus.com/~esr/home.html

Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Previous message: Kent Landfield: "Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
In reply to: Kent Landfield: "Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
Next in thread: Tim Pierce: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"
Reply: Tim Pierce: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]