Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
• Previous message: Richard Mathews: "Re: (copyright) Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
• In reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
• Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"
• Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"

> > If people see the need for a new auxiliary header then vote on one and
> > its semantics and take www talk to www-talk. FAQs will exist for years
> > to come and 'pie in the sky' discussions add little to improving them.
>
> No flame intended, but what `www-talk' are you referring to?

No flame intended, but I assumed that someone as gung-ho
about the World Wide Web such as yourself would already be
subscribed to the www-talk mailing list.

That you aren't even aware of its existence might suggest
something about your familiarity with the subject.

• Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
• Previous message: Richard Mathews: "Re: (copyright) Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
• In reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
• Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"
• Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]