Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?

Kent Landfield (Kent_Landfield@sterling.com)
Sun, 11 Dec 94 14:07:48 CST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
Previous message: banksie@khantazi.central.co.nz: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"

Please re-focus the conversation on FAQs and their related maintenance.
Take ISP or regional problems to another list or to email. They, plus
pricing worries, are of no concern to most on this list.

If people see the need for a new auxiliary header then vote on one and
its semantics and take www talk to www-talk. FAQs will exist for years
to come and 'pie in the sky' discussions add little to improving them.

And please have the courtesy to send flames directly to me instead of
to the list.
-Kent+

-- 
Kent Landfield                        INTERNET: kent_landfield@sterling.com
Sterling Software                     UUCP:     uunet!kent || sparky!kent
Phone: (402) 291-8300                 FAX:     (402) 291-4362
Please send comp.sources.misc-related mail to kent@uunet.uu.net.

Next message: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
Previous message: banksie@khantazi.central.co.nz: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"
Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: Can we talk about FAQ maintenance instead of non-related discussions ?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]