Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?

Pat Berry (pat@berry.Cary.NC.US)
Wed, 07 Dec 94 22:50:44 EST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pat Berry: "Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
Previous message: Aliza R. Panitz: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Maybe in reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Next in thread: Tom Limoncelli: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"

rsk@gynko.circ.upenn.edu (Rich Kulawiec) writes:

> 2. Mailing lists are obsolete. Single points-of-distribution
> get overloaded. Multiple conflicting automated managers exist
> (e.g. listserv, majordomo, etc.). Bounced messages often end
> up in subscriber's mailboxes.

You got that right. I had 13 new messages this evening, and 10 of them
were bounced copies of my posts to this mailing list. Who do I complain
to?

Next message: Pat Berry: "Re: Internet Info CDROM (fwd)"
Previous message: Aliza R. Panitz: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Maybe in reply to: Eric S. Raymond: "The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"
Next in thread: Tom Limoncelli: "Re: The FAQ system approaches obsolescence. What do we do now?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]