faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

RFC 4508 - Conveying Feature Tags with the Session Initiation Pr


Or Display the document by number




Network Working Group                                           O. Levin
Request for Comments: 4508                         Microsoft Corporation
Category: Standards Track                                    A. Johnston
                                                                   Avaya
                                                                May 2006

                    Conveying Feature Tags with the
             Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) REFER Method

Status of This Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

   The SIP "Caller Preferences" extension defined in RFC 3840 provides a
   mechanism that allows a SIP request to convey information relating to
   the originator's capabilities and preferences for handling of that
   request.  The SIP REFER method defined in RFC 3515 provides a
   mechanism that allows one party to induce another to initiate a SIP
   request.  This document extends the REFER method to use the mechanism
   of RFC 3840.  By doing so, the originator of a REFER may inform the
   recipient as to the characteristics of the target that the induced
   request is expected to reach.

Table of Contents

   1. Introduction ....................................................2
   2. Terminology .....................................................2
   3. Definitions .....................................................3
   4. Examples ........................................................3
      4.1. isfocus Feature Tag Usage ..................................3
      4.2. Voice and Video Feature Tags Usage .........................3
      4.3. Example with URI parameters and multiple feature tags ......3
   5. Security Considerations .........................................4
   6. Acknowledgements ................................................4
   7. Normative References ............................................4

1.  Introduction

   This document extends the SIP [2] REFER method defined in RFC 3515
   [3] to be used with feature parameters defined in RFC 3840 [4].

   Feature tags are used by a UA to convey to another UA information
   about capabilities and features.  This information can be shared by a
   UA using a number of mechanisms, including REGISTER requests and
   responses and OPTIONS responses.  This information can also be shared
   in the context of a dialog by inclusion with a remote target URI
   (Contact URI).

   Feature tag information can be very useful to another UA.  It is
   especially useful prior to the establishment of a session.  For
   example, if a UA knows (through an OPTIONS query, for example) that
   the remote UA supports both video and audio, the calling UA might
   call, offering video in the SDP.  Another example is when a UA knows
   that a remote UA is acting as a focus and hosting a conference.  In
   this case, the UA might first subscribe to the conference URI and
   find out details about the conference prior to sending an INVITE to
   join.

   This extension to the REFER method provides a mechanism by which the
   REFER-Issuer can provide this useful information about the REFER-
   Target capabilities and functionality to the REFER-Recipient by
   including feature tags in the Refer-To header field in a REFER
   request.

2.  Terminology

   In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
   "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
   and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].

   To simplify discussions of the REFER method and its extensions, three
   new terms are used throughout the document:

    o  REFER-Issuer: the UA issuing the REFER request
    o  REFER-Recipient: the UA receiving the REFER request
    o  REFER-Target: the UA designated in the Refer-To URI

3.  Definitions

   The Refer-To BNF from RFC 3515:

   Refer-To = ("Refer-To" / "r") HCOLON ( name-addr / addr-spec )
                     *(SEMI generic-param)

   is extended to:

   Refer-To = ("Refer-To" / "r") HCOLON ( name-addr / addr-spec )
                     *(SEMI refer-param)
   refer-param = generic-param / feature-param

   where feature-param is defined in Section 9 of RFC 3840 [4].

   Note that if any URI parameters are present, the entire URI must be
   enclosed in "<" and ">".  If the "<" and ">" are not present, all
   parameters after the URI are header parameters, not URI parameters.

4.  Examples

4.1.  isfocus Feature Tag Usage

   The example below shows how the "isfocus" feature tag can be used by
   REFER-Issuer to tell the REFER-Recipient that the REFER-Target is a
   conference focus and, consequently, that sending an INVITE will bring
   the REFER-Recipient into the conference:

   Refer-To: sip:conf44@example.com;isfocus

4.2.  Voice and Video Feature Tags Usage

   The example below shows how a REFER-Issuer can tell the REFER-
   Recipient that the REFER-Target supports audio and video and,
   consequently, that a video and audio session can be established by
   sending an INVITE to the REFER-Target:

   Refer-To: "Alice's Videophone" <sip:alice@videophone.example.com>
                   ;audio;video

4.3.  Example with URI parameters and multiple feature tags

   The example below shows how the REFER-Issuer can tell the REFER-
   Recipient that the REFER-Target is a voicemail server.  Note that the
   transport URI parameter is enclosed within the "<" and ">" so that it
   is not interpreted as a header parameter.

   Refer-To: <sip:alice-vm@example.com;transport=tcp>
                   ;actor="msg-taker";automata;audio

5.  Security Considerations

   Feature tags can provide sensitive information about a user or a UA.
   As such, RFC 3840 cautions against providing sensitive information to
   another party.  Once this information is given out, any use may be
   made of it, including relaying to a third party as in this
   specification.

   A REFER-Issuer MUST NOT create or guess feature tags. Instead, a
   feature tag included in a REFER SHOULD be discovered in an
   authenticated and secure method (such as an OPTIONS response or from
   a remote target URI in a dialog) directly from the REFER-Target.

   It is RECOMMENDED that the REFER-Issuer includes in the Refer-To
   header field all feature tags that were listed in the most recent
   Contact header field of the REFER-Target.

   A feature tag provided by a REFER-Issuer cannot be authenticated or
   certified directly from the REFER request.  As such, the REFER-
   Recipient MUST treat the information as a hint.  If the REFER-
   Recipient application logic or user's action depends on the presence
   of the expressed feature, the feature tag can be verified.  For
   example, in order to do so, the REFER-Recipient can directly send an
   OPTIONS query to the REFER-Target over a secure (e.g., mutually
   authenticated and integrity-protected) connection.  This protects the
   REFER-Recipient against the sending of incorrect or malicious feature
   tags.

6.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank Jonathan Rosenberg for providing
   helpful guidance to this work.

7.  Normative References

   [1]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [2]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A.,
        Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP:
        Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002.

   [3]  Sparks, R., "The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Refer
        Method", RFC 3515, April 2003.

   [4]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., and P. Kyzivat, "Indicating User
        Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",
        RFC 3840, August 2004.

Authors' Addresses

   Orit Levin
   Microsoft Corporation
   One Microsoft Way
   Redmond, WA  98052
   USA

   Phone: 425-722-2225
   EMail: oritl@microsoft.com

   Alan Johnston
   Avaya
   St. Louis, MO 63124

   EMail: ajohnston@ipstation.com

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).

 

User Contributions:

Comment about this RFC, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA