faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

RFC 4143 - Facsimile Using Internet Mail (IFAX) Service of ENUM


Or Display the document by number




Network Working Group                                          K. Toyoda
Request for Comments: 4143                                           PCC
Category: Standards Track                                     D. Crocker
                                                             Brandenburg
                                                           November 2005

          Facsimile Using Internet Mail (IFAX) Service of ENUM

Status of This Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

   This document describes the functional specification and definition
   of the ENUM Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) record for IFax service.
   IFax is "facsimile using Internet mail".  For this use, the Domain
   Name System (DNS) returns the email address of the referenced IFax
   system.  This mechanism allows email-based fax communication to use
   telephone numbers instead of requiring the sender to already know the
   recipient email address.

1.   Functional Specification

   An IFax client makes a [ENUMbis] DNS query, using the target system's
   telephone number.  The returned NAPTR record specifies an email
   address to be used for reaching the target system.  The email address
   is then used in accordance with Simple Mode of Facsimile using
   Internet Mail [RFC3965], Extended Facsimile using Internet Mail
   [RFC2532], or Full Mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail [FFPIM] is
   applied.

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY"
   in this document are to be interpreted as defined in "Key words for
   use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels" [KEYWORDS].

2.  IFax Service Registration

   Service Name : "E2U+ifax"

   Type: "ifax"

   Subtype: "mailto"

   URI Scheme: "mailto"
   The URI Scheme is "mailto" because facsimile is a profile of standard
   Internet mail and uses standard Internet mail addressing.

   Functional Specification: See section 1

   Security Considerations: See section 3

   Intended usage: COMMON

   Author: Kiyoshi Toyoda (toyoda.kiyoshi@jp.panasonic.com)
           Dave Crocker (dcrocker@bbiw.net)

3.  Security Considerations

   DNS, as used by ENUM, is a globally distributed database.  Thus, any
   information stored in it is visible to anyone anonymously.  Although
   this is not qualitatively different from publication in a telephone
   directory, it does expose the data subject to automatic data
   collection without any indication that this has been done or by whom.

   Data harvesting by third parties is often used to generate lists of
   targets for unrequested information; in short, the lists are used to
   address "spam".  The publication of a telephone number in ENUM,
   especially when it is an associated Internet fax service, may be used
   to send "junk faxes", for example.

   In the case of electronic mail, users subscribed to mailing lists can
   have "sacrificial" email accounts.  These special-purpose addresses
   help the user filter out unrequested email.  This is not so easy with
   published telephone numbers.  The PSTN E.164 number assignment
   process is much more involved and less flexible; usually a single
   E.164 number (or a fixed range of numbers) is associated with each
   PSTN access.  Thus, it is not possible to use a "sacrificial" phone
   number.

   Due to the implications of publishing data in a globally accessible
   database, as a principle, the data subject MUST give explicit
   informed consent to data being published in ENUM.

   Internet Fax is based on existing use of Internet mail.  Developers
   and users should also consider the Security Consideration sections in
   [RFC3965] and [RFC2532].

   In addition to the specific security considerations given above, the
   Security Considerations section of [ENUMbis] applies to this
   document.

4.  Example

   The following is an example of the use of IFax service in a NAPTR
   record.

      $ORIGIN 4.3.2.1.6.7.9.8.6.4.e164.arpa
        IN NAPTR 10 10 "u" "E2U+ifax:mailto"
                               "!^.*$!mailto:toyo@example.com!"

5.  IANA Considerations

   This specification creates a DNS NAPTR registration, according to the
   terms specified in [ENUMbis].

   The registration details are contained in section 2, Fax Service
   Registration.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [KEYWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [ENUMbis]  Faltstrom, P. and M. Mealling, "The E.164 to Uniform
              Resource Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery
              System (DDDS) Application (ENUM)", RFC 3761, April 2004.

   [RFC3965]  Toyoda, K., Ohno, H., Murai, J., and D. Wing, "A Simple
              Mode of Facsimile Using Internet Mail", RFC 3965, December
              2004.

   [RFC2532]  Masinter, L. and D. Wing, " Extended Facsimile Using
              Internet Mail", RFC 2532, March 1999.

   [FFPIM]    Crocker, D. and G. Klyne, "Full-mode Fax Profile for
              Internet Mail (FFPIM)", RFC 4142, November 2005.

Authors' Addresses

   Kiyoshi Toyoda
   Research and Development Laboratory
   Panasonic Communications Co., Ltd.
   4-1-62 Minoshima Hakata-ku, Fukuoka 812-8531 Japan

   Phone: +81-50-3380-5181
   EMail: toyoda.kiyoshi@jp.panasonic.com

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   675 Spruce Drive
   Sunnyvale, CA  94086  USA

   Phone: +1.408.246.8253
   EMail: dcrocker@bbiw.net

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
   ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

 

User Contributions:

Comment about this RFC, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA