Search the Archives

RFC 2228: There is a n error in section 3.It states:(see Section 9,...

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 2228

Comment by nsiyer
Submitted on 2/7/2004
Related RFC: RFC 2228
Rating:	Rate this comment:
There is a n error in section 3.It states:(see Section 9, "Base 64 Encoding")"Base 64 Encoding" is actually section 10