Search the Archives

RFC 791: Shouldn't this document mention that on little-endian...

Reader comments:

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: RFC 791

Comment by J Sridhar
Submitted on 2/15/2006
Related RFC: RFC 791
Rating:	Rate this comment:
Shouldn't this document mention that on little-endian systems, the IHL (Internet header length) bits come before the version? The structure listed here puts the version first and the IHL second which is correct for big-endian systems.