Consider a star at the upper part of the main sequence and a...

<< Back to: [sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9)

FAQS.ORG makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the posts. Each post is the personal opinion of the poster. These posts are not intended to substitute for medical, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. FAQS.ORG does not endorse any opinion or any product or service mentioned mentioned in these posts.

<< Back to: [sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9)

[ Home | FAQ-Related Q&As | General Q&As | Answered Questions ]

Question by endie
Submitted on 11/28/2003
Related FAQ: [sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9)
Rating:	Rate this question:
Consider a star at the upper part of the main sequence and a star in the lower part of the main sequence. Which is larger,more luminous,more massive,and Hotter

Answer by JRE
Submitted on 9/23/2005
Rating: Not yet rated	Rate this answer:
upper part of the main sequence (hydrogen burning stars) is made up of short lived blue giants and blue super-giants, which would be hotter brighter and larger than the stars lower on the main sequence.

Answer by stylin
Submitted on 3/19/2006
Rating: Not yet rated	Rate this answer:
are you a girl or gay.

Your name or nickname:
If you'd like to create a new account or access your existing account, put in your password here:
Your answer: