[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Single Page
Top Document: comp.windows.x Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 7/7
Previous Document: 151) Is this a memory leak in the X11R4 deletion of work procs?!
Next Document: 153) Are callbacks guaranteed to be called in the order registered?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Single Page
Top Document: comp.windows.x Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 7/7
Previous Document: 151) Is this a memory leak in the X11R4 deletion of work procs?!
Next Document: 153) Are callbacks guaranteed to be called in the order registered?
152) Why does the process size of my X programs go up,up,up?
Using "ps" may not show any decrease in memory size after a malloc/free pair. With most vendors' implementations of memory managers, the call to free does not return memory to the operating system; it is probably maintained on a free list for the process. In addition, ps may not be an accurate report of current memory usage requirements.
Top Document: comp.windows.x Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 7/7
Previous Document: 151) Is this a memory leak in the X11R4 deletion of work procs?!
Next Document: 153) Are callbacks guaranteed to be called in the order registered?
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
faq%craft@uunet.uu.net (X FAQ maintenance address)
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:36 AM