Top Document: comp.sources.testers - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: News Headers Next Document: Why not use alt.sources ? It seems to have been serving the community well. See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge CHARTER: The purpose of this newsgroup is to give authors of software packages a place to post in hopes of finding people willing to test their packages. No source code should ever be posted to comp.sources.testers. comp.sources.testers should be used as a first stage before posting to any of the source newsgroups, including alt.sources, comp.sources.misc, comp.sources.games, comp.sources.unix, the various machine specific source groups, and even comp.sources.reviewed. Most of the subject lines should look like Subject: Need beta testers for ppmtovcr, another portable bitmap converter or perhaps final announcements like Subject: Done with gamma testing for ppmtovcr, posted to c.s.misc along with acknowledgments. Cross posts into comp.sources.testers are fine when there's an appropriate subject group. Topics like Subject: What metrics do you use for evaluating object-oriented programs? belong in comp.software-eng, not comp.sources.testers. User Contributions:Top Document: comp.sources.testers - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: News Headers Next Document: Why not use alt.sources ? It seems to have been serving the community well. Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: sources-testers-faq@sparky.sterling.com
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: