|
Top Document: Signature, Finger, & Customized Headers FAQ Previous Document: ... 3.3 Animated Text Strings Next Document: ... 3.5 Newsgroups for Sig Discussion See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge
Q: Tim, why do you and others put random, provocative words like
the following in your sig?
--
Green Card fodder: Canter, Siegel, green card, Joel Furr, liable,
fortune, conspiracy, CyberSell, Tennessee Bar.
A: The original genesis of this bit of lore was the NSA's
supposed archiving of Usenet. It's a popular urban legend
that the NSA scans and archives every message posted to
Usenet, and in the heyday of this story it was popular to
add "spook fodder" to your .signature consisting of words
like "conspiracy, bullion, plutonium, Saudi Arabia,
president, assassination," and so on. I think that the GNU
Emacs distribution still comes with the code that would
insert such words into your posts or .signatures
automatically.
A couple of years ago there was a nut named Clayton Cramer
who would periodically bombard soc.motss with pages and
pages of pseudo-scientific babble about the evils of
homosexuality. It got so tiring that after a while I
amended my .signature to read "Clayton-Fodder:
homosexuality, pedophilia, incest, guns, Second Amendment,
Libertarian, Reagan," or some such. It got quite a few
giggles from some of the old hands out there.
A more recent example was the case of "Serdar Argic," a
program written by a U of Minnesota student to search for
any article referencing Turkey or Turkish culture, and
follow up with several pages of invective about Armenian
genocide. There were some reports that this program was
faulty and began responding to articles about "Thanksgiving
Turkey" and the like, but I don't recall ever seeing that
happen, myself. Nevertheless, people started putting "Argic
fodder" into their .signatures, like "Turkey, Armenia, SDPA
crooks, genocide" in order to bait the "Argic-bot" into
following up.
The latest rumor is that Canter and Siegel are archiving
every post which refers to them, in the hopes of finding
grounds for a libel suit. Hence, my .signature (which only
goes to newsgroups in the news.* hierarchy). It's a
ridiculous idea, but this is one of those bits of folklore
which I really enjoy perpetuating.
User Contributions:Top Document: Signature, Finger, & Customized Headers FAQ Previous Document: ... 3.3 Animated Text Strings Next Document: ... 3.5 Newsgroups for Sig Discussion Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: FAQ Editor <faq-editor@ii.com>
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM
|

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: