[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
    Search the FAQ Archives

Single Page

Top Document: SGI performer Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Previous Document: -8- The IRIS Performer Technical Report
Next Document: -10- What version of IRIS Performer should I use?


-9- How does IRIS Performer relate to IRIS Inventor?



  The short answer is, Performer was designed for vis-sim, while
  Inventor was designed to be more general purpose.  

  IRIS Performer is for developers who need to extract maximum
  performance from SGI machines for visual simulation, virtual
  reality, game development, and high-end CAD systems.  Often these
  applications need multi-processor Onyx systems with multiple
  RealityEngine pipelines with a high degree of parallelism and
  running at fixed frame rates.

  Inventor is designed for maximum programmer productivity when
  writing other kinds of 3D applications, like modelling, animation,
  visualization, etc.

  Both toolkits are general purpose enough that they could be extended
  into the domain of the other, but the question you should consider is
  "what is the *fundamental* goal of my graphics development?" If it's
  portability to non-SGI systems, easy X-window system integration, or
  handy graphic widgets, IRIS Inventor is for you.  If it's brochure-
  level performance in advanced graphic applications for the specific
  domains listed above, then IRIS Performer would be the likely tool.



Top Document: SGI performer Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Previous Document: -8- The IRIS Performer Technical Report
Next Document: -10- What version of IRIS Performer should I use?

Single Page


[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]

Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
sgi-faq@viz.tamu.edu (The SGI FAQ group)

Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:34 AM

Some parts © 2009 Advameg, Inc.