|
Top Document: SGI performer Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: -8- The IRIS Performer Technical Report Next Document: -10- What version of IRIS Performer should I use? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge The short answer is, Performer was designed for vis-sim, while Inventor was designed to be more general purpose. IRIS Performer is for developers who need to extract maximum performance from SGI machines for visual simulation, virtual reality, game development, and high-end CAD systems. Often these applications need multi-processor Onyx systems with multiple RealityEngine pipelines with a high degree of parallelism and running at fixed frame rates. Inventor is designed for maximum programmer productivity when writing other kinds of 3D applications, like modelling, animation, visualization, etc. Both toolkits are general purpose enough that they could be extended into the domain of the other, but the question you should consider is "what is the *fundamental* goal of my graphics development?" If it's portability to non-SGI systems, easy X-window system integration, or handy graphic widgets, IRIS Inventor is for you. If it's brochure- level performance in advanced graphic applications for the specific domains listed above, then IRIS Performer would be the likely tool. User Contributions:Top Document: SGI performer Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: -8- The IRIS Performer Technical Report Next Document: -10- What version of IRIS Performer should I use? Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: sgi-faq@viz.tamu.edu (The SGI FAQ group)
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM
|

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: