[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Single Page
Top Document: SGI apps Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Previous Document: -51- Why does make(1) complain about syntax errors that I can't find?
Next Document: -53- Why does my floating point signal processing routine, when given certain inputs, run incredibly slowly and
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Single Page
Top Document: SGI apps Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Previous Document: -51- Why does make(1) complain about syntax errors that I can't find?
Next Document: -53- Why does my floating point signal processing routine, when given certain inputs, run incredibly slowly and
-52- What's wrong with strip(1)?
In IRIX 5.2 and 5.3, strip(1) fails to remove all of the debugging information that it could. This isn't a big problem; it just wastes a bit of disk space. Patches 247 and 248 fix that bug. Patch 410 to IRIX 5.3 includes a new loader (ld32), the output of which strip mangles horribly. Patch 1068 and IRIX 6.2 include a strip which can strip ld32 binaries, but which does not follow symlinks. In IRIX 6.0 and 6.0.1, 'strip *' strips the first executable correctly and corrupts the rest. Work around the bug by stripping only one file at a time.
Top Document: SGI apps Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Previous Document: -51- Why does make(1) complain about syntax errors that I can't find?
Next Document: -53- Why does my floating point signal processing routine, when given certain inputs, run incredibly slowly and
Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
sgi-faq@viz.tamu.edu (The SGI FAQ group)
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:34 AM