Search the FAQ Archives

3 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M
N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z
faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

Invariant Galilean Transformations On All Laws
Section - 1. Purpose

( Single Page )
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index | Neighborhoods ]


Top Document: Invariant Galilean Transformations On All Laws
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 2. Table of Contents
See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge
The purpose of this document is to provide the student of Physics,
especially Relativity and Electromagnetism, the most basic princ-
iples and logic with which to evaluate the historic justification 
of Relativity Theory as a necessary alternative to the classical 
physics of Newton and Galileo.  

We will prove that all laws are invariant under the Galilean
transformation, rather than some being non-invariant, after 
we show you what that means. 

We shall also show that another primal requirement that SR
exist is nonsense: Michelson-Morley and Kennedy-Thorndike do
indeed fit Galilean (c+v) physics.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA




Top Document: Invariant Galilean Transformations On All Laws
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 2. Table of Contents

Single Page

[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]

Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
Thnktank@concentric.net (Eleaticus)





Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM