[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Single Page
Top Document: [comp.lang.perl.moderated] Welcome - read this first!
Previous Document: Welcome to clpmod!
Next Document: 2. What topics are appropriate for clpmod?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Single Page
Top Document: [comp.lang.perl.moderated] Welcome - read this first!
Previous Document: Welcome to clpmod!
Next Document: 2. What topics are appropriate for clpmod?
1. Do we really need a moderated Perl newsgroup?
This is the rationale Mark-Jason Dominus provided for the creation of
clpmod:
The comp.lang.perl.misc group presently has very high
traffic: typically about 250 articles per day. Much of this
traffic is given over to people asking off-topic questions,
and questions answered in the FAQ.
In these circumstances, a number of regular posters to the
group have stopped reading comp.lang.perl.misc, while new
readers can find it difficult to find relevant posts. The
result is reduced usefulness of the existing
comp.lang.perl.misc newsgroup.
This comp.lang.perl.moderated group is proposed as high
signal-to-noise group where readers will not be subjected to
the types of articles described above. The intention is to
provide a useful resource for inexperienced Perl programmers
and to attract and retain experienced programmers who can
make a substantial contribution to the group.
comp.lang.perl.misc would still be left in place for more
general discussion, and for those topics that no one seems
to agree on a place for.
However, if you're asking this question or don't buy the above rationale,
there is no reason for you not to continue using clpmisc. The existence
of clpmod has no bearing on clpmisc.
Top Document: [comp.lang.perl.moderated] Welcome - read this first!
Previous Document: Welcome to clpmod!
Next Document: 2. What topics are appropriate for clpmod?
Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
mjd-clpm-policy@plover.com
Last Update December 01 2008 @ 00:11 AM