Top Document: alt.guitar.rickenbacker Frequently Asked Questions Previous Document: 5.19 Which Rickenbacker did which Beatle use to record which song? Next Document: 5.21 Why doesn't Rickenbacker manufacture (overseas) a budget range like Squier/Epiphone/DeArmond? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge "The 360 was originally the deluxe version of the 330." [Ted Breaux, tabreaux@neworleans.net, 11/4/1998] "The choice was made to call the Deluxe model a 360 and the standard model was a 330 --- the terms WB, OS, & WBBS did not exist at the time----the 360 was enough different to warrant its on model number designation because of the Deluxe features --- more features higher model number. That is a simple question to answer ---way back when----in the early 60's before 64 there were no 360's with rounded top edge and binding on back only---the originals were 330 thin semi hollowbody and 360 deluxe thin semi hollowbody the only difference between a 330 and a 360 was the 360 had white binding, front and back, bound fingerboard, triangle neck inlays, and both standard & Ric O Sound jacks----they shared a common body. It was not until the new 360 body style came out in 1964 with the rounded front edge and binding only on back came out, that the original style body became known as 360OS (old style) at first then 360WBBS(white binding both sides) was used later then even later 360WB( white binding ) was used to refer to the original style 360 binding style. The answer, I guess, is that the term WB did not exist/was not in use at that time in history." [Encapsulight, NoSPAM@Please.com, 11/4/1998] "Well, the 330 is a bit more acoustic, and that is reflected somewhat in the plugged-in sound. The 360 has quite a bit more wood at the edges, while the 330 is routed out quite a bit more. This is just a guess, but the interior air volume of a 330 if probably 15% greater than a 360, and only some of that comes from having a fully developed lower bout. It's not a huge difference but it IS noticeable." [John Hall, jhall@rickenbacker.com, 1/14/2000] User Contributions:Top Document: alt.guitar.rickenbacker Frequently Asked Questions Previous Document: 5.19 Which Rickenbacker did which Beatle use to record which song? Next Document: 5.21 Why doesn't Rickenbacker manufacture (overseas) a budget range like Squier/Epiphone/DeArmond? Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: gerardlanois@netscape.net
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: