[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Single Page
Top Document: MH Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) with Answers
Previous Document: 05.25 How can I keep repl from breaking long lines?
Next Document: 06.00 ***** Posting *****
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Single Page
Top Document: MH Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) with Answers
Previous Document: 05.25 How can I keep repl from breaking long lines?
Next Document: 06.00 ***** Posting *****
05.26 How do I fix a bogus In-Reply-To or missing References field?
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 21:42:21 -0800 In the past, the In-reply-to header field looked as it does in the new Comments field (see "How can I make sense of the replcomps file?"). However, the old format is no longer allowable under RFC 2822 which specifies that this field should only include the Message-ID. You can fix the replcomps and replgroupcomps files by upgrading to nmh 1.1 (be sure to update your personal copies if applicable) or simply by fixing the In-reply-to field in your own replcomps file using the example in the question referenced in this paragraph. In addition, older replcomps files lacked the References field which enables threading in capable UIs. You can get it in the same fashion as the In-reply-to field--by upgrading or copying.
Top Document: MH Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) with Answers
Previous Document: 05.25 How can I keep repl from breaking long lines?
Next Document: 06.00 ***** Posting *****
Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:26 AM