Top Document: Fractal Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Previous Document: Strange attractors Next Document: Julia sets See reader questions & answers on this topic!  Help others by sharing your knowledge Q6a: What is the Mandelbrot set? A6a: The Mandelbrot set is the set of all complex c such that iterating z > z^2+c does not go to infinity (starting with z=0). An image of the Mandelbrot set is available on the WWW at gopher://life.anu.edu.au:70/I9/.WWW/complex_systems/mandel1.gif . Other images and resources are: Frank Rousells two hyperindex of clickable/retrievable Mandelbrot images: ftp://ftp.cnam.fr/pub/Fractals/mandel/Index.gif Mandelbrot Images (Frank Rousell) ftp://ftp.cnam.fr/pub/Fractals/mandel/Index2.gif Mandebrot Images #2 (Frank Rousell) http://www.wpl.erl.gov/misc/mandel.html Interactive Mandelbrot (Neal Kettler) http://www.ntua.gr/mandel/mandel.html Mandelbrot Explorer (interactive) (Panagiotis J. Christias) http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Edu/Fractal/Fractal_Home.html Fractal Microscope http://hermes.cybernetics.net/distfract.html Distributed Fractal Generator for SunOS Sparcstations (James Robinson) Q6b: How is the Mandelbrot set actually computed? A6b: The basic algorithm is: For each pixel c, start with z=0. Repeat z=z^2+c up to N times, exiting if the magnitude of z gets large. If you finish the loop, the point is probably inside the Mandelbrot set. If you exit, the point is outside and can be colored according to how many iterations were completed. You can exit if z>2, since if z gets this big it will go to infinity. The maximum number of iterations, N, can be selected as desired, for instance 100. Larger N will give sharper detail but take longer. Q6c: Why do you start with z=0? A6c: Zero is the critical point of z^2+c, that is, a point where d/dz (z^2+c) = 0. If you replace z^2+c with a different function, the starting value will have to be modified. E.g. for z>z^2+z+c, the critical point is given by 2z+1=0, so start with z=1/2. In some cases, there may be multiple critical values, so they all should be tested. Critical points are important because by a result of Fatou: every attracting cycle for a polynomial or rational function attracts at least one critical point. Thus, testing the critical point shows if there is any stable attractive cycle. See also: 1. M. Frame and J. Robertson, A Generalized Mandelbrot Set and the Role of Critical Points, _Computers and Graphics_ 16, 1 (1992), pp. 3540. Note that you can precompute the first Mandelbrot iteration by starting with z=c instead of z=0, since 0^2+c=c. Q6d: What are the bounds of the Mandelbrot set? When does it diverge? A6d: The Mandelbrot set lies within c<=2. If z exceeds 2, the z sequence diverges. Proof: if z>2, then z^2+c>= z^2c> 2zc. If z>=c, then 2zc> z. So, if z>2 and z>=c, z^2+c>z, so the sequence is increasing. (It takes a bit more work to prove it is unbounded and diverges.) Also, note that z1=c, so if c>2, the sequence diverges. Q6e: How can I speed up Mandelbrot set generation? A6e: See the information on speed below (see "Fractint"). Also see: 1. R. Rojas, A Tutorial on Efficient Computer Graphic Representations of the Mandelbrot Set, _Computers and Graphics_ 15, 1 (1991), pp. 91100. Q6f: What is the area of the Mandelbrot set? A6f: Ewing and Schober computed an area estimate using 240,000 terms of the Laurent series. The result is 1.7274... However, the Laurent series converges very slowly, so this is a poor estimate. A project to measure the area via counting pixels on a very dense grid shows an area around 1.5066. (Contact mrob@world.std.com for more information.) Hill and Fisher used distance estimation techniques to rigorously bound the area and found the area is between 1.503 and 1.5701. References: 1. J. H. Ewing and G. Schober, The Area of the Mandelbrot Set, _Numer. Math._ 61 (1992), pp. 5972. 2. Y. Fisher and J. Hill, Bounding the Area of the Mandelbrot Set, _Numerische Mathematik_, . (Submitted for publication). Available by ftp: legendre.ucsd.edu:/pub/Research/Fischer/area.ps.Z .. Q6g: What can you say about the structure of the Mandelbrot set? A6g: Most of what you could want to know is in Branner's article in _Chaos and Fractals: The Mathematics Behind the Computer Graphics_. Note that the Mandelbrot set in general is _not_ strictly selfsimilar; the tiny copies of the Mandelbrot set are all slightly different, mainly because of the thin threads connecting them to the main body of the Mandelbrot set. However, the Mandelbrot set is quasiselfsimilar. The Mandelbrot set is selfsimilar under magnification in neighborhoods of Misiurewicz points, however (e.g. .1011+.9563i). The Mandelbrot set is conjectured to be self similar around generalized Feigenbaum points (e.g. 1.401155 or .1528+1.0397i), in the sense of converging to a limit set. References: 1. T. Lei, Similarity between the Mandelbrot set and Julia Sets, _Communications in Mathematical Physics_ 134 (1990), pp. 587617. 2. J. Milnor, SelfSimilarity and Hairiness in the Mandelbrot Set, in _Computers in Geometry and Topology_, M. Tangora (editor), Dekker, New York, pp. 211257. The "external angles" of the Mandelbrot set (see Douady and Hubbard or brief sketch in "Beauty of Fractals") induce a Fibonacci partition onto it. The boundary of the Mandelbrot set and the Julia set of a generic c in M have Hausdorff dimension 2 and have topological dimension 1. The proof is based on the study of the bifurcation of parabolic periodic points. (Since the boundary has empty interior, the topological dimension is less than 2, and thus is 1.) Reference: 1. M. Shishikura, The Hausdorff Dimension of the Boundary of the Mandelbrot Set and Julia Sets, The paper is available from anonymous ftp: math.sunysb.edu:/preprints/ims917.ps.Z [129.49.18.1].. Q6h: Is the Mandelbrot set connected? A6h: The Mandelbrot set is simply connected. This follows from a theorem of Douady and Hubbard that there is a conformal isomorphism from the complement of the Mandelbrot set to the complement of the unit disk. (In other words, all equipotential curves are simple closed curves.) It is conjectured that the Mandelbrot set is locally connected, and thus pathwise connected, but this is currently unproved. Connectedness definitions: Connected: X is connected if there are no proper closed subsets A and B of X such that A union B = X, but A intersect B is empty. I.e. X is connected if it is a single piece. Simply connected: X is simply connected if it is connected and every closed curve in X can be deformed in X to some constant closed curve. I.e. X is simply connected if it has no holes. Locally connected: X is locally connected if for every point p in X, for every open set U containing p, there is an open set V containing p and contained in the connected component of p in U. I.e. X is locally connected if every connected component of every open subset is open in X. Arcwise (or path) connected: X is arcwise connected if every two points in X are joined by an arc in X. (The definitions are from _Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics_.) User Contributions:Top Document: Fractal Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Previous Document: Strange attractors Next Document: Julia sets Single Page [ Usenet FAQs  Web FAQs  Documents  RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: stepp@marshall.edu
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: