[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
The North America Free Trade Agreement came into effect on
January 1st, 1994. NAFTA attempts to bring down trade barriers
between Mexico, Canada and the USA. One of the "barriers" has
been that of approval of material. As of January first, CSA
approval of a device is legally considered equivalent to UL
approval in the USA. Conversely, UL is now accepted as
equivalent to CSA approval in Canada. Theoretically, this
means that devices marked only with UL approval are acceptable
in the CEC, and conversely CSA approval by itself of a device
is accepted by the NEC. This allows much freer trade in
electrical materials between the two countries.
This doesn't affect the electrical codes themselves, so the
differences in practice between the NEC and CEC will remain.
It is also my understanding that bilateral acceptance of
"approval" will only apply when the standards applied are
reasonably the same. As an example, a cable approved by the
NEC for a given purpose may not be acceptable by the CEC for
the same purpose if the standards requirements are different.
Eg: "NMD" ("non-metallic, damp") cable is usually required for
residences in Canada. "NM" cable ("non-metallic, not damp
locations) which is used in the same situations in the US,
would probably not be acceptable in Canada. Also,
municipalities can add additional requirements on top of the
CEC, as they can in the US over the NEC.
Thus, Canadians will probably start seeing UL-only approved
materials in stores, and Americans the same regarding
CSA-only. But some differences will remain. When in doubt on
major items, consult an inspector. At least in Canada, the
fact that the material is available in a store usually means
that it's okay to install.
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
Last Update May 13 2007 @ 00:22 AM