[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
The cost of blood glucose measurement strips is a complex interaction of R&D costs, manufacturing costs, marketing strategy, insurance practices, and undoubtedly other factors. You can ask on the net if you want; you'll get lots of comments but no answers. There are a few of ways of reducing the cost of blood glucose monitoring. One is to seek out the best price for the strips; large stores such as FEDCO often have good prices, as do some mail order suppliers (see mail order section). A second way is to choose a meter with lower cost strips. Your health care team may be familiar with and prefer a particular meter, but it's not likely that they considered cost in making their choice. If you insist that you need a lower cost system, they should be willing to work with you. All meters now on the market are adequately accurate for home use. A third way is to use visually read strips (Chemstrip bG and a couple of lesser known brands) and cut them in half or even in thirds. Do the cutting carefully with a pair of strong, *clean* scissors, and get the strips back into the vial as quickly as possible. Some manufacturers claim this procedure will cause problems, but those who have used the technique report that it works well. Visually read strips are slightly less accurate than meters. However, as of 1998, prices on visually read strips are relatively high, and you will have to consider whether the projected savings are worth the time to cut strips and the loss of the convenience which meters give. Do *not* cut strips when using them in meters. The results will be totally incorrect. Most discussion on m.h.d of the cost of blood glucose measurement strips has centered on the US. I'm not sure why, though a good guess is that differences in health care systems and national policies make this issue more critical to the individual patient in the US. There is no dearth of non-US participants on m.h.d.
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
Last Update May 13 2007 @ 00:22 AM