Top Document: [rec.arts.comics] REVIEWS FAQ: Technical Guide Previous Document: Posting Problems Next Document: Examples See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge If you will be crossposting your review to a non-rac.* newsgroup, like rec.arts.books.reviews, rec.arts.movies.reviews, or rec.arts.sf.reviews, *please* make sure that your review fits that newsgroup's review criteria. Crossposting is fine, and is even encouraged, but please make sure to read the FAQs of those groups so your reviews won't be rejected. Followups should be set to three or fewer discussion groups, either within the r.a.c.* hierarchy or within other *appropriate* hierarchies, not including the .reviews or .info newsgroups. *** FAQ FOR REC.ARTS.BOOKS.REVIEWS URL: ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/faqs/books/reviews-faq An essential read for anyone interested in crossposting book reviews to rec.arts.books.reviews (such as prose comics novels, coffee table books, biographies, and the like). *** WELCOME TO REC.ARTS.SF.REVIEWS URL: ftp://net.bio.net/pub/misc/sf-reviews/ While I am not sure if this document is currently updated, its Guidelines still stand. Individual issues of continuing comic books ARE NOT subject matter for r.a.sf.r. "Series-within-series," or full runs of such comics, are. Limited series (in whatever "format") ARE appropriate subject matter for r.a.sf.r. The Subject line of r.a.sf.r postings MUST include the title of the work and the creator's name. *** Other Information The current practice for posting movie reviews to rec.arts.movies.reviews is to list the subject as REVIEW: TITLE (year); a quick glance at other reviews in the newsgroup rec.arts.movies.reviews should provide all of the information you need. The current practice for posting Star Trek reviews to the newsgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews is to use these keywords: TOS for the Original Series, TNG for Next Generation, DS9 for Deep Space Nine, and VOY for Voyager. Comics would also have the keyword BOOK added to them, as in REVIEW: [TOS BOOK] STAR TREK #6 or the like. Reading the newsgroup rec.arts.startrek.reviews will give you more examples. The rec.arts.sf.reviews and rec.arts.books.reviews newsgroups prefer that bibliographic information be included in the addbib format (available in UNIX or just type it) so that it can be easily accessed from the archives. It can be appended to the bottom of a review post as follows (an asterisk [*] denotes a required datum): %H Header commentary, printed before reference * %A Author's name (use a separate %A line for each) * %T Title of article or book * %B Anthology/collection title for individual stories/articles %E Editor (of book or series) * %I Issuer (publisher's name and imprint) %C City (place of publication) * %D Date of publication * %G Government order number (use this for ISBN) %P Page number(s) (use for page count) %S Series title %V Volume number %O Comments/etc. (use for format/price, ordering info) %J Journal containing article %K Keywords User Contributions:Top Document: [rec.arts.comics] REVIEWS FAQ: Technical Guide Previous Document: Posting Problems Next Document: Examples Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: racmx@yahoo.com (Kate the Short)
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: