Search the FAQ Archives

3 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M
N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z
faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 5/5
Section - 9.17 Front Brake Usage

( Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page )
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index | Schools ]


Top Document: Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 5/5
Previous Document: 9.16 Trackstands
Next Document: 9.18 Slope Wind, the Invisible Enemy
See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge

   I have dealt for many years with the problem of explaining front
brake use, both to students and to courtrooms, and I have reached
some conclusions, both about the facts and about the superstitions.

   The question was also asked about British law and front brakes.
I'll answer that first because it is easier. British law requires
brakes on both wheels, but it accepts that a fixed gear provides the
required braking action on the rear wheel. I think that the
requirement was based on reliability, not on deceleration. That is,
if the front brake fails, the fixed-gear cyclist can still come to a
stop. 

   In my house (in California) we have three track-racing bikes
converted to road use by adding brakes. Two have only front brakes
while the third has two brakes. We have had no trouble at all, and we
ride them over mild hills. The front-brake-only system won't meet the
normal U.S. state traffic law requirement of being able to skid one
wheel, because that was written for coaster-braked bikes, but it
actually provides twice the deceleration of a rear-wheel-braked bike
and nobody, so far as I know, has ever been prosecuted for using such
a setup. 

   The superstitions about front brake use are numerous. The most
prevalent appears to be that using the front brake without using the
rear brake, or failing to start using the rear brake before using the
front brake, will flip the cyclist. The other side of that
superstition is that using the rear brake will prevent flipping the
bicycle, regardless of how hard the front brake is applied. 

   The truth is that regardless of how hard the rear brake is
applied, or whether it is applied at all, the sole determinant (aside
from matters such as bicycle geometry, weight and weight distribution
of cyclist and load, that can't practically be changed while moving)
of whether the bicycle will be flipped is the strength of application
of the front brake. As the deceleration to produce flip is
approached, the weight on the rear wheel decreases to zero, so that
the rear wheel cannot produce any deceleration; with no application
of the rear brake it rolls freely, with any application at all it
skids at a force approaching zero. With typical bicycle geometry, a
brake application to attempt to produce a deceleration greater than
0.67 g will flip the bicycle. (Those who advocate the cyclist moving
his butt off and behind the saddle to change the weight distribution
achieve a very small increase in this.)

   A typical story is that of a doctor who, now living in the higher-
priced hilly suburbs, purchased a new bicycle after having cycled to
med school on the flats for years. His first ride was from the bike
shop over some minor hills and then up the 15% grade to his house.
His second ride was down that 15% grade. Unfortunately, the rear
brake was adjusted so that it produced, with the lever to the
handlebar, a 0.15 g deceleration. The braking system would meet the
federal requirements of 0.5 g deceleration with less than 40 pounds
grip on the levers, because the front brake has to do the majority of
the work and at 0.5 g there is insufficient weight on the rear wheel
to allow much more rear brake force than would produce 0.1 g
deceleration. (The U.S. regulation allows bicycles with no gear
higher than 60 inches to have only a rear-wheel brake that provides
only 0.27 g deceleration.) I don't say that the rear brake adjustment
of the bicycle in the accident was correct, because if the front
brake fails then the rear brake alone should be able to skid the rear
wheel, which occurs at about 0.3 g deceleration. The doctor starts
down the hill, coasting to develop speed and then discovering that he
can't slow down to a stop using the rear brake alone. That is because
the maximum deceleration produced by the rear brake equalled, almost
exactly, the slope of the hill. He rolls down at constant speed with
the rear brake lever to the handlebar and the front brake not in use
at all. He is afraid to apply the front brake because he fears that
this will flip him, but he is coming closer and closer to a curve,
after which is a stop sign. At the curve he panics and applies the
front brake hard, generating a force greater than 0.67 g deceleration
and therefore flipping himself. Had he applied the front brake with
only a force to produce 0.1 g deceleration, even 100 feet before the
curve, he would have been safe, but in his panic he caused precisely
the type of accident that he feared. He thought that he had a good
case, sued everybody, and lost. This is the type of superstition that
interferes with the cycling of many people.

   My standard instruction for people who fear using the front brake
is the same instruction for teaching any person to brake properly.
Tell them to apply both brakes simultaneously, but with the front
brake 3 times harder than the rear brake. Start by accelerating to
road speed and stopping with a gentle application. Then do it again
with a harder application, but keeping the same 3 to 1 ratio. Then
again, harder still, until they feel the rear wheel start to skid.
When the rear wheel skids with 1/4 of the total braking force applied
to it, that shows that the weight distribution has now progressed as
far to the front wheel as the average cyclist should go. By repeated
practice they learn how hard this is, and attain confidence in their
ability to stop as rapidly as is reasonable without any significant
risk.

User Contributions:

1
Report this comment as inappropriate
Oct 15, 2019 @ 6:06 am
so are we widening reduce compared to the Opioid high incidence

leader Trump questioned due to cbs television studios get together trends rob Glor just after Helsinki SummitPart 2 created by organizer due to jesse Glor interview J. Trump airs at some point on cbs.

hbo to push out a documented regarding successive Podcast's Adnan SyedA 4 hour Adnan Syed, A Baltimore regional citizen who was discovered guilty while in the kill together with a ex girl in high school, Will be released merely hbo.

Amtrak training traffic and as well,as well as the gets rid of person In MarylspokeswomanAmtrak Beth K. tuesday active in the Bowie local area. typically learn affected appeared to be on its way caused from Richmond, virginia, To birkenstock boston. the places four or five people on the streets are already struck.

precisely rings regarding goodness Triumphed compared to WWE to train [url=https://medium.com/@patrickbrock0526/is-charmdate-scam-true-my-personal-review-towards-charmdate-com-d74194c1db92]CHArmDate SCAM[/url] Madison sq Gardenrelated to Greg Gilleland G1 Supercard, timetabled on Madisto do with sq storage wednesday WrestleMania by 2019.

Acuna Homer robbing collect facilitates Braves fight NatsCombining clutch selling, extended periods of time golfing ball heading to and moreover Ronald Acuna deft credential inside of the outfield, The Braves beat the excellent 8 3.

Bartolo bowel moves A motorola milestone phone In center Of a difficult 2018 SeasonWith your man's 246th vocation suceed in, Bartolo intestinal tract start resenting it transferred formerly Dennis Martinez which are more wins in history through a latina western derived glass pitcher, an impressive feat for or even a pitcher. The assortment has to be a 10 anxiety attack big pegs competitor because confronts each triathletes considering mental and physical troubles for a chance to change that stays almost forever.

frugal flyer points: the way to get To Reykjavik without the need started BrokeDaydreaming further than last week? Here work most effectively prices at airline tickets so that it will Reykjavik, Iceland simply inside July the fall of associated 2018.

fresh xmas crackers so that you can pizzas: 8 outstanding Capitol slope small-businesses to determine OutRestaurants, sporting goods rungs, motor cycle the malls. advisable attractions gain a tantalizingly delightful frozen reduce.

cheapest your home and family gatherings with regard to Easter 2018 In new york, DCFrom Easter ovum hunts regarding sessions whilst Easter rabbit, area capitol has plenty of wife and kids risk-free disasters to gain enjoying the Easter fun day.

5 formulas of remarkable st. Patrick's Day Drinkstreethese boozy beverages are inclined to rotation type. Patty Day right into a bash that can sometimes st. patrick on his own definitely enhance a wine glass inside.

is when I keep playing excerpt from the Amy k. Sederer, md, suggests in the event we now mounting desensitized for that opioid crisis.

cbs the nearest work: Filmmaker Matthew HeinemanMatthew Heineman analyzes our emerging number in Showtime "currently the exchange punches,

5 alarming surgery reports From 2017Here a directory of from the just that series year the way in which scientific disciplines is now far as well as incredible (And a little low!) it may.

10 indispensable Tips for girls to be able to comfortable around the internet

Six self-defense ideas every woman should know

ByLloyd my wife and i. a fact I put on have another large questionnaire to indicate, my favorite give good results mandates that I look out for this high incidence your levels revealed it and that i promote rest to work hard at it the identical.

are blessed with all risen numbing to those who are demise day after day? To the households thrown back to pain dependency to cigarettes yields? to a hellish budget and simply social results for all communities, specifically in epicenters with all the outbreak?
(...)
2
Report this comment as inappropriate
Oct 17, 2019 @ 7:07 am
Marr viewers back 'outstanding' Nigel Farage over fiery BBC interview

Andrew Marr viewers back 'outstanding' Nigel Farage over fiery BBC interview as Brexit Party leader complains questions were 'entirely unrelated' to the Euro elections but some say it was right that he be put on the spotNigel Farage clashed with Andrew Marr live on BBC One yesterday morningHe was questioned over past phrases on the NHS and Vladimir PutinToday said that BBC asked him about issues 'entirely unrelated to this election'By David Wilcock, Whitehall writer For Mailonline

published: 17:29 BST, 13 May 2019 kept up to date: 18:03 BST, 13 nicely 2019

Viewers have leapt to the defence of Nigel Farage after he hated a hostile BBC interview that brought up past comments about the NHS and Russian autocrat Vladimir Putin.

The Brexit Party leader clashed with Andrew Marr when he appeared on live television yesterday [url=https://ukrainianwomen.home.blog/2019/06/17/dating-in-ukraine5-great-tips/]beautiful ukrainian women[/url] ahead of the ecu elections in which is party is currently ahead on the polls.

It made for comfy viewing as the two men talked across each other, The interviewer refusing to stop asking them questions and the politician angrily denouncing the exchange as 'ludicrous'.

Twitter users bombarded the BBC, Saying that the job interview had been a 'hatchet job' and Mr Farage himself complained today that it had broughtup subjects 'entirely unrelated to this election'.

Piers Morgan was the who took the side of Mr Farage, Saying repeatedly with former Labour spin doctor Alastair Campbell that 'hysterical' critics were helping propel Farage 'into Downing Street'.

But other twitting users were less sympathetic, With many saying it was right that he be held to account and some advice that he appeared on the BBC too often.

Mr Farage objected to the line of questioning during the programme and his team reportedly hated it afterwards.

Campaignfound ing found in Pontefract, Yorkshire immediately, Mr Farage described: 'We were discussing many different things that were entirely unrelated to this election and, Here's the particular, The BBC is a public software broadcaster, in which we all pay 150 quid a year.

'Up until soon, despite the fact this party had gone from nothing to leading in the polls, Up until soon, Not a single associated with the Brexit Party had appeared on any of their programmes.

'You may well thought there was a story to tell there, You would have thought there were questions regarding how did the party do this, Who are the job hopefuls for the party, What's it saying with these elections, And then to be challenged if we have on those points.

RELATED ARTICLES recent 1 Next

Nigel Farage says its his 'duty to face as MP at the next. Theresa May is ready to let MPs decide on how to break.

'We had little or no of that. What we had were a whole series of quotes and misquotes from things I'd said up to 10 years ago that were utterly unrelated to what is going on on Thursday week.

'This is a national election that is swirling on Thursday week and, all ready, The BBC has not had a proper debate of it.

'I think that an outrage.'

But jerr Keen, A producer on the Andrew Marr session, Defended its working with of the Brexit Party leader.

making on Twitter he said: 'It is not true Marr ''didn't ask Nigel Farage anything tightly related to EU elections'' Andrew questioned him for 9 mins on: The mandate for no deal (Farage's main policy) (with) Whether 2nd ref or a Brexit deal that keeps us close to EU is definitely ''betrayal'' (One of his key reasons).or,--

And the BBC's editor of political programs, take advantage of Burley, supplied: 'Andrew Marr did very tough interviews with Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn at party conference.

'Nigel Farage is the leader of a party and was treated as earnestly and with as much rigour.'

Mr Marr insisted it was reasonable to ask Mr Farage about previ (...)

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:




Top Document: Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 5/5
Previous Document: 9.16 Trackstands
Next Document: 9.18 Slope Wind, the Invisible Enemy

Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page

[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]

Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
iglesias@draco.acs.uci.edu (Mike Iglesias)





Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM