Top Document: Toyota RAV4 FAQ Previous Document: 2.3.6) What's new about the 2001 models? Next Document: 3.0) Keeping Your RAV4 Happy See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge This is a very subjective area, but in general, the RAV4 compares very well to it's competition. People like the RAV4 for it's combination of visual appeal ("cuteness"), good fuel economy, versatile FT 4WD system (fair off-road and excellent on-road), comfort, space, handling, acceleration, accessibility, and reliability. The RAV4 does have it's drawbacks, notably it's styling, lack of power, lack of space (compared to full-size sport-utilities), cheap construction in places, crashworthiness, mediocre sound system, and interior noise levels. Primary U.S. competitors as compared to the RAV4: Honda CR-V: much more conservative styling (often compared to a minivan), reactive 4WD system. Same reliability as Toyota, more interior room, more powerful engine. Worse off-road performance. Kia Sportage: Cheap. Poor engineering touches all around. Rough ride, uncomfortable seating, difficult access to cargo area. Subaru Forrester: Styling like a station wagon. Very car-like ride, low ground clearance, comfortable. Reactive 4WD system, similar to CR-V. Fuel efficient. Full-featured, excellent value. Suzuki Grand Vitara: Poor construction dominates the overall comments about this vehicle; inexpensive, but shows it. More horsepower, but doesn't seem to use it well, and correspondingly worse gas mileage. Good off-road vehicle for the price. User Contributions:Top Document: Toyota RAV4 FAQ Previous Document: 2.3.6) What's new about the 2001 models? Next Document: 3.0) Keeping Your RAV4 Happy Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: Ralph Becker <ralphbATwhoeverDOTcom@NOSPAM.com>
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: