|
Top Document: [sci.astro] Solar System (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (5/9) Previous Document: E.15 What's the difference between a solar and lunar eclipse? Where can I find more information about eclipses? Next Document: E.17 Asteroid Impacts See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge Comets have highly elliptical orbits. When at perihelion or closest approach to the Sun, they are typically about the same distance from the Sun as the Earth is. When at aphelion or farthest distance from the Sun, they can be well outside the orbit of Pluto. If a comet is observed for a sufficient period of time, its motion on the sky allows us to estimate when it is at perihelion and how far away aphelion is (more precisely, we can estimate the major axis of its orbit). In 1950 Jan Oort was analyzing the comets whose orbits had been determined. He discovered that many comets had their aphelia at roughly the same distance from the Sun, about 50,000 AU. (For reference, the Earth is at a distance of 1 AU from the Sun, Neptune is at a distance of 40 AU, and the nearest star is at a distance of 270,000 AU.) So Oort proposed that the Sun was surrounded by a vast swarm of comets, stretching nearly 1/5 of the distance to the nearest star. At these large distances from the Sun, these comets are only loosely gravitationally bound to the Sun. A slight gravitational nudge, from a star passing within a couple of light years or so perhaps, is enough to change their orbits dramatically. The gravitational tug can result in a comet either (1) becoming gravitationally unbound from the Sun and drifting into interstellar space never to return or (2) falling into the inner solar system. This is the currently accepted explanation for the origin of so-called "long-period" comets. These comets orbit the Sun at great distances, until a slight gravitational nudge changes their orbit and causes them to fall into the inner solar system, where we see them. Because their aphelia remain at large distances, it can take hundreds, thousands, or maybe even 1 million years before they return to the inner solar system. Comet Hale-Bopp is an example of such a comet. Theorizing that comets originate from the Oort cloud doesn't explain the properties of all comets, however. "Short-period" comets, those with periods less than 200 years, have orbits in or near the ecliptic---the plane in which the Earth and other planet orbit. Long-period comets appear to come from all over the sky. Short-period comets can be explained if there is a disk of material, probably left over from the formation of the solar system, extending from the orbit of Neptune out to 50 AU or more. Collisions between objects in such a disk and gravitational tugs from the gas giants in our solar system would be enough to cause some of the objects to fall into the inner solar system occasionally where we would see them. Comet Halley is probably an example of such a comet. Direct detection of Kuiper Belt objects occurred in the early 1990s with the detection of 1992/QB1, see <URL:http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/qb1.html>. Additional indirect evidence for a disk of material around the Sun comes from images of nearby stars which have disks around them. These disks around other stars are several times larger than the Kuiper Belt has thus far been observed to extend, but they might be qualitatively similar to the Kuiper Belt. See <URL:http://galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu/users/jewitt/Origins-bpic.html>. Interestingly, current theories for the origin of the Oort Cloud and Kuiper Belt indicate that the Kuiper Belt probably formed first. The Kuiper Belt is the detritus from the formation of the solar system. Objects from it that make it into the inner solar system can interact gravitationally with the giant planets, particularly Jupiter. Some objects would have had their orbits changed so that they impacted with one of the planets (like Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 did in 1994); some objects would be ejected from the solar system entirely; and some objects would be kicked into very large orbits and into the Oort cloud. User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: [sci.astro] Solar System (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (5/9) Previous Document: E.15 What's the difference between a solar and lunar eclipse? Where can I find more information about eclipses? Next Document: E.17 Asteroid Impacts Part0 - Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: jlazio@patriot.net
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|

with stars, then every direction you looked would eventually end on
the surface of a star, and the whole sky would be as bright as the
surface of the Sun.
Why would anyone assume this? Certainly, we have directions where we look that are dark because something that does not emit light (is not a star) is between us and the light. A close example is in our own solar system. When we look at the Sun (a star) during a solar eclipse the Moon blocks the light. When we look at the inner planets of our solar system (Mercury and Venus) as they pass between us and the Sun, do we not get the same effect, i.e. in the direction of the planet we see no light from the Sun? Those planets simply look like dark spots on the Sun.
Olbers' paradox seems to assume that only stars exist in the universe, but what about the planets? Aren't there more planets than stars, thus more obstructions to light than sources of light?
What may be more interesting is why can we see certain stars seemingly continuously. Are there no planets or other obstructions between them and us? Or is the twinkle in stars just caused by the movement of obstructions across the path of light between the stars and us? I was always told the twinkle defines a star while the steady light reflected by our planets defines a planet. Is that because the planets of our solar system don't have the obstructions between Earth and them to cause a twinkle effect?
9-14-2024 KP