} Your view that programs can't correct addresses like what you have described
} is absolutely bogus. Any programmer with any background in email environments
} could correctly convert these back. Articles should be replyable to and FAQs
} are originated as articles. By doing what you have proposed you are making
} the problem worse for your readers, the same folks you are trying to help
} by answering their frequently asked questions.
In my particular case, I get between 5 and 10 pieces of spam, 2 and 3
people using my sitefaq for testing their mailer, and other junk per day.
Real submissions are on the order of one per _month_.
I'm planning to set my FAQ's reply-to to /dev/null, and force people to
manually edit the reply addresses.
-- For more information on spam, including countermeasures and resources, see the Internet Spam Boycott, at <URL:http://www.vix.com/spam/>.Chris Lewis: _Una confibula non sat est_
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved