Re: FAQ-checker now up and running

Steve Summit (scs@eskimo.com)
Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:47:30 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mama Lani: "Re: please help with archival problem... (involves ethical issues)"
Previous message: Adam B. Roach: "Re: please help with archival problem... (involves ethical issues)"
In reply to: Pamela Greene: "FAQ-checker now up and running"

In <9603191417.AA03543@moe.optics.rochester.edu>, you wrote:
> With many thanks to the courageous beta testers, I am pleased to
> announce that the automated FAQ-checker is now up and running.
>...
> The FAQ-checker will automatically check to be sure that your posting
> follows these guidelines and send you a message explaining what's
> wrong if it doesn't. If your posting passes, the FAQ-checker will
> send it to us, with a special marker so we are able to process it more
> quickly.

Excellent work on someone's part! It's easy to say (and I'm
sure many critics have over the years) that the time taken to
write an automated checker would pay off handsomely over the
long run, but it's not always easy to dedicate the time to
write such a tool. Kudos to whoever did.

Steve Summit
scs@eskimo.com

Next message: Mama Lani: "Re: please help with archival problem... (involves ethical issues)"
Previous message: Adam B. Roach: "Re: please help with archival problem... (involves ethical issues)"
In reply to: Pamela Greene: "FAQ-checker now up and running"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]