Re: Being paid for a FAQ?

Laurent Duperval (laurent@Grafnetix.COM)
Fri, 12 Jul 1996 14:29:57 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Fred Burke: "Re: Being paid for a FAQ?"
Previous message: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Being paid for a FAQ?"
In reply to: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Being paid for a FAQ?"

> I don't know that I would call someone willing to pay for use of something
> stupid. It could be considered generous, appreciative, or manipulative.

I didn't want to imply that the person was (or wasn't) stupid. That's
the way the saying goes. In proper English, it would be: if someone
offers you something (which you want and/or need) then take it. You
would be a fool not to. (And I'm not implying anyone is a fool either).

-- 
Laurent Duperval, Systems Analyst       Grafnetix Systems Inc.
Tel: (514) 861-3389                     777, de la Commune Ouest
Fax: (514) 866-6206                     Suite 101, Montreal, Qc
Laurent@Grafnetix.COM                   Canada, H3C 1Y1
URL: http://www.Grafnetix.COM/~laurent

Next message: Fred Burke: "Re: Being paid for a FAQ?"
Previous message: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Being paid for a FAQ?"
In reply to: Larry W. Virden, x2487: "Re: Being paid for a FAQ?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]