I would rather not have more than one version of the FAQ Launchers but
I don't think we need to stick to HTML 2. I think that as long as we
stick with standard HTML (i.e., 2, 3, and above) and make sure that it
looks reasonable in the main browsers - Lynx, NCSA Mosaic, Netscape
Navigator, etc. - we will be providing a really useful tool to the
vast majority of the Net.
> 2) Nancy, consider a site-specific control path where a FAQ
> maintainer can e.g. _block_ listing of a particular archive in
> your metapage if the author is unhappy with the currency of the
> copy served from that archive, for example.
Could you give me an example FAQ where one of the archives (Utrecht,
Oxford, Smart Pages, Ohio State) really trashes the FAQ? If there
are examples of this happening then I agree that we should have a
way for maintainers to not have that archive listed in the launcher.
Thanks,
Nancy
PS: Since best.com has been having problems with their Web server, I've
mirrored the FAQ Launchers at:
http://www.jazzie.com/ii/faqs/
But, if possible, please use the best.com version:
because this is where I work on the prototype and it is more up to date.
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved