Re: Utrecht archive announcement and proposal

---------

Chris Thomas (ckt@best.com)
Thu, 30 Nov 1995 19:09:12 -0800


>Martin Trautmann <traut@iht0.iht.e-technik.th-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>> I prefer to include the URL within <,> since this may work as well when a
>> line gets wrapped. Working on a platform where blanks may occur frequently
>
>> URL: <ftp://site.com/path/file name> my description
>> URL: ftp://site.com/path/file name "my description"
>
>This URL should be
>
> ftp://site.com/path/file%20name
>
>which pretty much takes care of the "blanks" problem.

At the very least, both should be allowed (at most, the
"<>" solution should be adopted alone). I don't like reading
gibberish in URLs, and I'm sure I'm not alone. In theory,
tools should be able to interpret it. In practice, we'll be
staring at the URL in raw plaintext form for quite a while.

>I like:
> * Header name is "URL"
> * The first white-space-delimited word is the URL (no white space allowed)
> * The second quote-delimited word is a description (no quotes allowed)
> * Third, fourth, etc words are nothing for now, but might be used in the
> future

So, in other words, you want:

URL: ftp://site.com/path/file%20name "my description"

I'd prefer:

URL: <ftp://site.com/path/file name> "my description"

The one change being the greater/less-than delimiters.

Chris



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved