REVIEW: "Best of the Net" by Godin (fwd)

---------

Nancy McGough (nancym@ii.com)
Sat, 22 Jul 1995 18:00:43 -0700 (PDT)


I thought you all would be interested in this review that was
posted to bit.listserv.nettrain. I'm curious who all has mailed
letters complaining about the use of an excerpt of your FAQ
without permission. I'm planning to send in some type of
complaint one of these days...

Nancy
Infinite Ink
http://www.jazzie.com/ii/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Path: news1.wolfe.net!ratty.wolfe.net!news.sprintlink.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SLUVCA.SLU.EDU!millesjg
>Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
>Newsgroups: bit.listserv.nettrain
>Comments: ********************************************************
>Comments: * The following "Approved" statement verifies header *
>Comments: * information for gateway passage. No approval of the *
>Comments: * content is implied. *
>Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU *
>Comments: ********************************************************
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>Approved-By: MILLESJG@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU
>Message-ID: <Pine.PMDF.3.91.950716100730.1619044704A-100000@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU>
>Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 10:08:01 -0600
>Sender: Internet/BITNET Network Trainers <NETTRAIN@UBVM.cc.buffalo.edu>
>From: Jim Milles <millesjg@SLUVCA.SLU.EDU>
>Subject: REVIEW: "Best of the Net" by Godin
>Lines: 45
>
******************** Forwarded by NETTRAIN moderator ********************

Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 13:54:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Rob Slade, Social Convener to the Net <roberts@mukluk.hq.decus.ca>

BKBSTNET.RVW 950504

"Best of the Net", Seth Godin, 1995, 1-56884-313-5, U$22.99/C$32.99/UK#21.99
%A Seth Godin seth@sgp.com
%C 155 Bovet Road, Suite 310, San Mateo, CA 94402
%D 1995
%G 1-56884-313-5
%I IDG Books
%O U$22.99/C$32.99/UK#21.99 415-312-0650 fax: 415-286-2740 kaday@aol.com
%P 430
%T "Best of the Net"

Gee, it's rather gratifying to find your name in the acknowledgements section,
even if you had nothing to do with the book, can't find any contribution you
made, and can't, in fact, find your name mentioned thereafter. (Judging by my
friends in the list, I think our names were copied from the VIRUS-L FAQ.)

The book is supposedly made up of recommendations from "a group of Internet
experts" and "numbers of motivated, involved, smart people". But, as they say
in the academic papers, the study was flawed. Godin sent out a request for
people to send him stuff, so the study sample "self selected" for people who
had nothing better to do. Quick reality check. Do we have RISKS? No. Oak?
No. Net-happenings? No. alt.best.of.internet or usenet? No. RTFM? Yes
(once). The Vatican exhibit? No. rec.humor.funny? No (well, maybe fair
comment). News of the Weird? Yes. This Is True? No.

What we do have, here, are two hundred "topics", all two pages long. Each has
a few (very few) net references, mostly newsgroups. (A lot of the other
"references" are "veronica".) Some references are long out of date (and the
computer virus citations are awful). There are random pieces of information--
extracts from newsgroup postings or FAQ listings, and often a picture from
somewhere. These have no proper citations at all.

copyright Robert M. Slade, 1995 BKBSTNET.RVW 950504

==============
Vancouver ROBERTS@decus.ca | Omne ignotum pro magnifico.
Institute for Robert_Slade@sfu.ca | - Anything little known
Research into Rob.Slade@f733.n153.z1/ | is assumed to be
User .fidonet.org | wonderful.
Security Canada V7K 2G6 | - Tacitus



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved